Cats, Boris Badenough, and the Meaning of Life

Our cat is very old now and for the past few years has been suffering from diabetes and partial kidney failure (those familiar with cats know this this is manageable, but progressive and irreversible, and ultimately fatal). Over the past few months, she lost a lot of wait and became increasingly listless (two more “red flags” for those familiar with cats). We had to decide: was it time to euthanize her or should we prolong her life? According to her veterinarian, she was probably not feeling her best but probably not suffering either. Modifying her treatment for the kidney disease and diabetes might help, but it might not.

We decided to modify her treatments and prolong her life.

But why? How did we decide? I don’t believe in an afterlife: once you’re dead – it’s as if you had never been born. Those who believe in an eternal afterlife charge that without the promise of an afterlife, everything is meaningless – including life and death itself. According to this view, it would be perfectly fine to kill a healthy cat… or a healthy person… or all people… or just let the cat suffer until it died.

Let’s step back a bit and ask: if life and death are meaningless, why did I even agonize over what to do with my cat? Why not just kill her and save myself a lot of trouble? The answer is that I, like most other people (excluding those with certain social disorders), have an innate empathy for other living things – a natural product of evolution. I care if the cat suffers because I empathize with her. Empathy is the bases for the different versions of “the golden rule” that have arisen independently in various cultures at various times.

So now I have a motive: I want to treat the cat as I would like to be treated (to a point: I have more empathy for human “family” than for cats – another natural outcome of evolution). I personally would prefer to go on living, even with a certain amount of discomfort, but not if I’m terminal and I would be miserable until my immanent death. So the choice was clear: let her live while she feels OK and manage her disease as best we can to make her feel better longer.

What about the original charge: why does it matter if she (or I, or anyone) suffers if ultimately she dies, and it won’t matter then if she had suffered or not? The answer is that it matters while she is alive, even if it won’t matter after she’s dead.

Consider this generous offer by Dr. Boris Badenough: Dr. Badenough is testing his new torture device for the military. It is a virtual reality device of sorts that works directly on the nervous system to make you feel as though all of your teeth are being slowly extracted at once, and as if needles are being slowly inserted into your eyeballs, and plenty of other mean things that we can imagine. Since it works only on the nerves, there is actually no physical damage inflicted on the victim at all. Dr. Badenough offers to pay you one million US dollars if you will agree to help him test the machine by undergoing this excruciating torment for 8 hours. After the torment, you will emerge physically unharmed. Would you do it?

Maybe not – you might fear that you would emerge psychologically damaged from the experience. “No worries,” says Dr. Badenough – this device will completely erase all of your memory of the 8-hour ordeal. You will recall only that you have been sleeping peacefully for the unbearable 8 hours. Now would you do it? Why or why not? Would you do it for $100,000? How about $500?

Your answer, whether or not you would do it, is less important for this decision than what you considered while thinking about the decision. If you truly believe that experiences don’t matter now if they won’t matter later, then you wouldn’t hesitate to take the $500, maybe even much less. But most people will not decide so easily because experiences matter now even if they won’t matter later. If someone does agree to help Dr. Badenough, to what extent is he comforted during the torture by the knowledge that he won’t remember it?

Still not convinced? What was the most delicious meal you had in 1987? What did you have and how did it taste? Don’t remember? Then you probably won’t remember delicious meals you will have in the future – so there is no point having them. Bon appetit!


10 Responses to Cats, Boris Badenough, and the Meaning of Life

  1. […] Cats, Boris Badenough, and the Meaning of Life « Ask an Atheist […]

  2. dmoney012485 says:

    dang while reading the boris badenough part and seeing the million dollar offer i was like omg id do it lol id probably do it for 500$ no need to erase memory either :p

  3. AthiestAussie says:

    Aside from empathy for your cat’s feelings, how about taking some time to acknowledge your own feelings?

    I love my cat. I’d miss him terribly if he died. I would find making the decision to put him down very hard. Luckily, barring accidents, he’s several years away from me having to make that decision.

    OTOH, I think a lot of people keep their pets alive a lot longer than they should, and usually for selfish rather than empathic reasons.

    Ultimately, the decision is yours and has to be based on your assessment of how your cat is feeling.

    Interestingly, I recently heard that pets sometimes commit suicide. A friend of mine had an elderly dog that was constantly going outside and refusing to come in in Winter. Eventually they took it to the vet, who discovered a tumor which must have been very painful. The vet said that the dog had probably been trying to kill itself through hypothermia. Other pets will deliberately sit in the middle of a busy road or simply refuse to eat. So, sometimes they do make their own minds up.

    • The Atheist says:

      I don’t mind at all talking about my feelings. I love this cat. She’s been with me for several years and I feel pain just thinking about having to put her down and knowing the time is drawing near. I know I’ll grieve for her and I’ll probably cry like a baby when she dies.

      But that wasn’t the point of my post. My point was to talk about life having meaning, even if we believe life ends. That seems to be a stumbling block for many believers.

      I agree that people often are thinking only of themselves when keeping a pet alive. Very interesting comment about animals trying to commit suicide!

  4. AthiestAussie says:

    Oh, one other thing, the whole concept of the TV show “Dollhouse” is similar to your thought experiment.

    The “Dolls” have eached signed a five year contract. During that five years, their memory and personality are wiped, and new personalities and memories are implanted into them from time to time for assignments that range in time from a few hours to several days. The assignments often involve sex, violence and high physical risk.

    After five years, their original memory and personality is restored (as it was the day it was wiped leaving no memory at all of the five years). They’re handed a large cheque and off they go.

    Would you do it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: